Some people believe that wealthy nations ought to provide employment opportunities to the trained and educated workers from the developing and underdeveloped areas. This essay will discuss that I completely agree with this statement that it should be permissible for individuals from poorer regions to find jobs in wealthier regions because it is necessary to encounter poverty and get mutual advantages.
The main reason why affluent nations should let employments for experienced and bright workers who are from destitute regions of the world is that fighting poverty is an international responsibility. As unemployment is the basic cause of triggering poverty in poor areas, one solution to fight with this problem is by giving chances to work to the people, who meet the requirements, from poor areas. For instance, large organizations including Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and Yahoo are already working on this principle to eradicate poverty and have employees from all over the world. In short, other rich companies should also hire workers from deprived areas.
A secondary reason why well-off countries should hire individuals who fulfill the criteria from third world regions is that it is mutually beneficial for them. Not only it will help the poor nations to tackle poverty and starvation problems, but also will help the rich nations to continue to prosper and flourish in the future. For example, employees from underdeveloped areas take fewer advantages as compared to the workers from the same regions and contribute their energy and talents endlessly to rich companies.
In conclusion, this essay discussed that I strongly agree with the idea that prosperous countries ought to permit employment for the workforces from deprived nations who are talented and intelligent because of the two reasons: to lessen the poverty and to enhance the mutual cooperation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and to enhance the mutual cooperation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44027303754 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90924352507 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535836177474 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9539218924 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.4 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254592370001 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107560203578 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380272249856 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160901288262 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383867100137 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.