Individual can do nothing to help improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Environmental protection is a debating topic nowadays. It is argued by some people that single person cannot do anything to keep the atmosphere clean while government and huge firms can protect the atmosphere because they have control and enough funds to do so. This essay will discuss that every distinct person can make difference.

Individuals can save the environment as a whole. For instance, there is an old saying, “success is the sum of the small efforts-repeated day in and day out”. For example, if every person in the UK saves one piece of paper daily, a million trees can be saved in a day. Additionally, if everyone stops utilizing things which are not environmental friendly then it would have a gigantic influence on big companies and they would definitely find some eco-friendly replacements. For example, in Canada, when ordinary people stopped using plastic bags in the market, their manufacturer stopped producing those and replaced them with fabric or paper bags. For these reasons, we should realize our worth and should fulfill our part to protect and make the environment clean.

Conversely, we cannot ignore the role of government and big companies to protect the environment. There is no doubt that to solve a large-scale problem like global warming, government and large industries should utilize their assets and powers. Additionally, the government should protect the environment by enforcing laws and through public awareness campaigns.

This essay discussed that people who believe that a single person cannot do anything to protect the atmosphere have a flawed understanding and underestimate the power of an individual. In my opinion, everyone should take responsibility to protect the environment. Government and big corporations should design rules and make use of their influences and assets to implement the rules and regulations while individual should follow those directions and contribute to environmental protection.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contribute to environmental protection.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46732026144 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12099031494 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6309266506 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195088807365 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684994114122 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520890102801 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126918825373 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516146318427 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.