Juvenile delinquencies are ubiquitous nowadays. This essay will discuss the main causes of youngsters committing illegal actions including the influence of media and nuclear families. This essay will also suggest solutions to these problems comprising some censorship of media and improvement in family structures.
Internet and television have a powerful influence on teen’s actions. Whatever violence they are watching on the internet and in action movies, they try to copy it in real life. For example, in the USA, a student killed 30 pupils just after watching a television program. In addition, mostly the youths committing crimes have dysfunctional families. No one used to teach moral values to children and keep eye on their peers in these families. For instance, a survey- conducted by Harvard University- found that children from nuclear families are more inclined towards delinquencies. They may fall into bad company and resort to drugs. For drugs, they desperately need money which turns them toward offense.
Applying some restrictions on media programs as well as improvement in the family atmosphere are critical to mitigating misconducts ratio among children. Parents should watch movies and programs with children so that they can keep an eye on what their children are being exposed to. We should encourage joint families and parents should also monitor the friends’ circle of their kids. For instance, many children go astray due to the negligence of parents. Therefore, in order to reduce the delinquencies rate among adolescence government should apply restriction on vulgarity and violence shown on media and parents should also provide good family environment and closeness at home.
In conclusion, juvenile crimes rate has risen tremendously in most countries around the world. This essay discussed how illegal acts are committed by youngsters due to media and family problems. This essay also suggested that the solutions to this problem are twofold: to apply suppression on media programs and to have closeness among family members.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52351097179 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86674673613 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570532915361 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9794171963 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7368421053 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147581477515 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445421620143 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045436418906 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101119374178 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511529915432 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.