The provided bar graph illustrates the number of private vehicles people have in China for 12 years between 1987 and 1999. The unit is measured per thousand people.
Overall, it can be seen that the general trend was upward, with all years showing a dramatic increase in the number of private automobiles people had during that period.
At the start in 1987, people had approximately 250 personal means of transportation per thousand people and this number increased to slightly under the 1000 vehicle in 1991. In the subsequent years, the number of vehicles per thousand individuals soared and reached almost 2000 cars in 1995 which was doubled than the previous number. Furthermore, this number grew significantly through the following years, and in 1999, the figure rose well over 4000 vehicles per thousand citizens. The number of vehicle processions, in China, per thousand persons was nearly twelve times higher in 1999 than it was in 1987.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63665035188 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625806451613 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2441881041 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.066276677928 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363107260838 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342495201219 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483720972259 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371191685024 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.