In this set of amterials the reading passages discusses that some possile expelanation for a mass extention that occured at the end of the Triassic period. While the professor cast doubts on what is peresented in the text and believes that Non of these theoris that mentioned in the passages if not enough strong and true to demonstared this mass extention.
First of all, in the text it is clearlt mentioned that the flactuation in the sea levels is the reason of this extention and expelain that the fall in the sea levels led to killing the land species. However, the professor claims that t this time the sea levels had not very strong flactuation and i was take place for some milion years.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that this mass extention is related to climte cooling. She says that it is true that the rise in atmospheric SO2 can have cooling effect in weather. But this affect is not long enough to can resulted a mass extention. Because this gas absorbe through solving in the water and it is led to cleaning the air.
Finally, in tyhe text it is stated that an astteroids impact led to production of debris and blocking the sunlight and kill of plants and animals. the professor subscribes that the scientist do not fined any asteroeid impact at this time that can provide this happen. and the evidence shows that the asteroid impact dated to twonty milion years before this mass extention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...els had not very strong flactuation and i was take place for some milion years. ...
^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...unlight and kill of plants and animals. the professor subscribes that the scientist...
^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...this time that can provide this happen. and the evidence shows that the asteroid im...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68650793651 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4835405515 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4577351245 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.