The quality of health care a person receives should not depend on the size of their bank balance. The government is responsible for providing a high level of health care for all its citizens. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a world of unequal distribution in income, wealth and opportunities, only few members of society can afford quality health care. Health is pivotal to everyone to become a functional member of society and thus, leads to a progressive community. This essay agrees to the concept that the government should yield high quality health care to its people regardless of how much money they can offer.
First and foremost, the primary responsibility of the government is to provide basic amenities needed by its citizenry and one of this includes health care stabilization. Owing to timely fair collection of taxes from the people, it is irrefutable that everyone, be they are affluent or indigent, should have equal access also to all governmental services. For instance, the health bureau could post enough number of qualified medical staffs in rural and urban areas providing latest health care treatment and facilities, and free medical check-up to those in needs.
Secondly, it can be agreed that creating a healthy nation leads to a quality life and proactive community. Take for example in Japan, local authorities are providing equal health support to everyone and even more privilege given to downtrodden people and senior citizens. Due to this, the pros of this action became more evident wherein there is a decreased rate of mortality and severe hospitalization. Moreover, this gave the locals an opportunity to increase their savings and pursue to continue work to support their family.
To put it in a nutshell, the government can make a vast change to its nation life and productivity by establishing a law which will reinforce equal health care treatment for everyone. It can be hoped that in future, bureaucratic officials will work upon this matter and make this plan happen regardless of their people financial capability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'providing the latest'.
Suggestion: providing the latest
...medical staffs in rural and urban areas providing latest health care treatment and facilities, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ment for everyone. It can be hoped that in future, bureaucratic officials will work upon ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21212121212 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89446378805 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2107182967 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298714286203 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103713821958 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754313104564 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175402256416 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554289946501 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.