In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion?
Presently, new habitats are essential to be built for the growing population in many places of the world, but scarcity of lands for constructing them prevents the establishment of new buildings in the urban areas. Hence, many suggest to construct them in the rural areas. However it’s a controversial issue which creates great discordance among people.
The opponent of spreading organisation to the rural areas state that it would bring catastrophic effects to the natural ecosystem of that particular areas. The most egregious consequences will be happened when, many other infrastructures that necessarily follow human settlement like roads, sanitation networks, power lines would be established. These types of engineering works would definitely deplete the biome of the ponds, rivers and forests of adjacent regions. As an inevitable consequence of it, the indigenous species would migrate or become extinct. Moreover, there is a good chance of these deleterious effects to be aggravated day by day as the number of the settlers grows. Even though the arguments of the environmentalist make sense but they are even though the arguments of the environmental is make sense but there are plethora of tangible ideas justifying the occupation of rural areas for urbanization.
First of all, modern people are more aware about the environment, and during urbanization the experts use to spare a significant portion of spaces intended to be used as parks or some other open places to move around. Besides serving as the sanctuary for the wild spaces these types of free spaces help the city dwellers to become relaxed. It could be best exemplified by the city of Dhaka where I live, has a large island in between parts of the city which is mostly covered by trees and remained unoccupied, being a nice counterpart of the overly populated nearby districts.
In conclusion, I would like to stress that while the environmentalists have many valuable points against spreading the urbanization to the countryside, the situation is not as dire as they portray it, and coexistence of human being with nature is quite possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest constructing'.
Suggestion: suggest constructing
...ildings in the urban areas. Hence, many suggest to construct them in the rural areas. However it&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t to construct them in the rural areas. However it's a controversial issue which c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'work'.
Suggestion: work
...established. These types of engineering works would definitely deplete the biome of t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nt, and during urbanization the experts use to spare a significant portion of spac...
^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts use to spare a significant portion of spaces intended to be used as parks or s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25806451613 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06045697859 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58357771261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3474297542 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119590739266 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384805583263 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576782319456 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757949342787 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626895762456 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.