The growing population is a matter of concern for many countries. The major cities are getting overcrowded every day with rapid inscrease of pupulation and houses are getting congested, so there is a huge demand of new living places to build houses. The only solution is to build homes in the countryside to meet this crisis, which will not only solve the problem, but also allow the countryside to develop faster. However, few people who cares for nature believes that countryside should be restricted from building homes. This will disscuss why building new livelihoods in the countryside is a good idea going forward.
Sceince and technolgy has contributed a lot of new and unbelieving power to human being. With the advancement in architectural part, it now possible to build enormous high rises touching the coulds and above. In the race of this urban progress, we have almost forgot to preserve the nature. As the demand are growing for homes and office, builders are constructing more and more buildings to cope up with it, while destroying the greenary. There could be the same risk if building homes in the countryside are allowed.
In many cities around the world has proven that urbanisation is also possible keeping the nature intact with beatiful planning and layouts. So, instead of making the cities conjusted, the people can be moved to the countryside. But, the authorities have to be careful as well as strict on the design of the build and localities. This will also give the chance to the people, who are already a part of countryside, to grow and develop like the modern cities.
In conclusion, faster developement has shown many negative signs when it has been done without a proper project plan. Where as, there are instances when development has been done without harming the nature. So, in my opinion it will be great idea to build properties in the countryside and connect them with the cities, but major importance has to be given to the planning to protect it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d of new living places to build houses. The only solution is to build homes in the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
... of this urban progress, we have almost forgot to preserve the nature. As the demand a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...een done without a proper project plan. Where as, there are instances when development h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91124260355 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69053846544 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1421236998 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6470588235 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300143325623 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867792218496 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650717244696 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168847336651 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832024772771 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.