It is a government’s responsibility to satisfy its citizens’ basic needs such as electricity, clean drinking water, freeway, and affordable housing. Some people think a high taxes is necessary. Nevertheless, others disagree, there is a controversial division about the high taxes.
Raising taxes to meet people's needs is a real thing that the government needs to consider. Due to a rapid increase in human population, serving everyone’s needs has become a challenging task and it requires tremendous resources. Since taxes are the only source of income for governments, there is no other way to fulfill people’s needs other than increasing taxes. For instance, Denmark has one of the highest tax rates in the world, the government makes the guarantee on education and healthcare. Thus the Danish think they are not paying taxes, they are investing in their society, and they are purchasing quality of life.
On the other hand, some people worry about that high taxes will probably kill entrepreneurship and investment. The political decision-makers should bear in mind that entrepreneurship is affected by fiscal policy. When taxes are high, there are fewer entrepreneurs, and fewer businesses are created, fewer investment, which means that less wealth is created. There are studies which show that high taxes reduce the funding available for business creation.
In conclusion, governments need to follow a combined strategy of raising taxes, they should not only fulfil the needs of the citizens but also consider the development of the country. They need the better public services, and need the GDP as well. So, I think that the balance of taxes can lead to the circular flow of economy, lead to the greater communal facilities, and lead to people’s happiness in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... guarantee on education and healthcare. Thus the Danish think they are not paying ta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35087719298 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16938649782 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8203942632 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196015057882 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076819593757 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714396743595 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122927812204 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332169326243 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.