TPO24 INTEGRATED
The reading passage states that animal fossils may provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt that the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article, the breaking of the fossilized leg bone revealed many small branching channels inside. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that these things are not necessary cell blood but also it would be something else. Bacteria which live inside that may make colonies and as a result, they may have left organic materials there and it won’t be blood vessels necessarily.
Second, the reading claims that microscopes examination of varies parts of inner bone revealed the presence of spheres that could be the remains of led blood cells. On the country, the professor in the lecture refutes the information presented in the reading and makes the point that the fossils of other animals which has found in the same area didn’t have to be blood vessels and this identical reddish spheres might be something else.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that the collagen which has found inside the bones can come from more recent sources like skins of researchers since collagen may not be exited more than one thousand years whereas these dinosaurs had been living more than seven hundred thousand years ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'microscopes'' or 'microscope's'?
Suggestion: microscopes'; microscope's
...arily. Second, the reading claims that microscopes examination of varies parts of inner bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than seven hundred thousand years ago.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, whereas, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15102040816 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40371086154 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579591836735 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9450777983 49.2860985944 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.75 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375214944349 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155852514781 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812754569956 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21229716303 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055793448957 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.