The reading passage states that the ethanol cannot replace the gasoline and provides three reasons. Nonetheless, the lecturer disagrees with the ideas presented in the reading and made a counterclaim to each of the author' idea.
First and foremost, the article suggests that ethanol is not beneficial to solve global warming because it releases carbon dioxide when it burns just like the gasoline does. However, the professor refused this point by saying that the ethanol is made of plants such as corn, so, when it grows, they absorb the carbon dioxide as well. According to him, even though the ethanol releases a carbon dioxide, it would not be harmful to the environment like the gasoline.
Secondly, the reading contends that the production of ethanol requires other plants that are the main source of animal food that causes to reduce the food of the animals. On the other hand, the lecturer explained that the plant that mostly made of cell walls that are also not eaten by the animals can also produce the ethanol. He also argued that ethanol production has nothing to do with reducing the amount of food supply.
Thirdly and finally, the passage claims that the ethanol fuel would be way expensive than the price of gasoline fuel. In contrast, the professor argued that even though the assistance of the government helps to maintain the price of ethanol fuel, it could not really affect the price considerably. Besides, he also said that once enough people buy it, its price would probably go down because when the number of people using it increased by three times, the price also reduced by forty percent as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
... main source of animal food that causes to reduce the food of the animals. On the other h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, however, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92028985507 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34197024248 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525362318841 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1562790882 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.454545455 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06452816374 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419392163407 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157047527051 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659540239105 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221910866548 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650306098916 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.