Much advancement in the field of science and technology has resulted in the creation of waste. Industrialization also creates a lot of waste and thus pollutes our environment and water bodies. It is time for the government, the industries and the public to take certain initiatives to reduce the amount of waste produced.
Firstly, science has revolutionized the field of medicine, with the introduction of new treatments to cure diseases. However, this comes at the cost of huge medical waste being produced in the hospitals. For example, earlier hospitals used to sterilize the needles after use, whereas now they have access to disposable ones which are cheap and efficient. Secondly, due to innovations in technology, industries are finding ways to speed up their production process. Because they want to produce more goods in less time, they decide not to recycle items. Lastly, an increase in the number of industries has created more employment opportunities which have improved the people’s standard of living. For instance, people can now afford to buy new mobile phones every 3 to 4 months and discard the old ones. This creates a lot of plastic waste which is not biodegradable.
While it might not be feasible to reduce the quantity of waste that is being produced, the government and the manufactures should take up steps to reuse and recycle. All of us can learn a lesson or two from space astronauts who recycle even urine into drinking water thus eliminating waste. The government must also come up with more programs to encourage the industries to create products that can be recycled, thus educating the people to recycle after use rather than throwing them away.
To conclude, technical, industrial and scientific inventions have increased the amount of waste that is being produced. But, science also teaches us to recycle waste or to use raw materials that produce minimum waste.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15064102564 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8966823816 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573717948718 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0425270485 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124767466454 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401943636321 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365617606258 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725026333567 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026582272913 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.