How to provide enough food for a growing population is an urgent worldwide problem, nowadays. A significant body of opinion is that GM foods are an alternative to this inconvenient. In my point of view, aliments genetically modified have plenty advantages and are a possible solution, however, this advance can has negative aspects.
Currently, GM foods are a widespread business around the world that provide large profits, and the companies that produce these seeds almost have a commercial monopoly in several countries. The success is due to grains, fruits and vegetables genetically modified have enormous advantages; they have a long durability, better shapes, colour and are resistant against different types of plagues. In short, GM foods seem to be the solution to the usual problems on crops since they are able to achieve a massive production that could decrease food prices; thus solving the feeding problem.
On the contrary, this modern seeds are creating the extinction of native species, that do not have all those advantages. Additionally, small farmers cannot compete against big producers that are able to sell their production at lower prices. For instance, in Bolivia many species of potatoes are disappearing since they are not enough competitive and productive to the market. Therefore, small producers are not sowing native species and are choosing the GM variety, that are approved in the market. On the whole, this advance on the production of food are risking native species and the existence of genetic diversity.
In conclusion, GM foods are able to produce enough quantities of food to solve the global feeding problem. Though, on the other side, this important advance are menacing the variety of food. Thus, I consider that it is important to protect native species to this genetic monopoly, to avoid their imminent extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is advance can has negative aspects. Currently, GM foods are a widespread bus...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s; thus solving the feeding problem. On the contrary, this modern seeds are c...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the existence of genetic diversity. In conclusion, GM foods are able to prod...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in short, on the contrary, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29292929293 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80215201455 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.268537368 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166125357958 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061813653743 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505225225538 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108303426961 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326921553435 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.