An urgent problem around the world is the huge production of garbage that our economic model generate day by day. In order to tackle this issue, it is important to identify the causes.
Our life style is one of the main factors of the uncontrolled production of rubbish around the world. The economic circuit need the constant consumption of products to keep stable. For that reason, companies through advertising encourage people to obtain the latest version of its products, discarding the oldest and generating immense amount of wastes. For instance, electronic garbage are a current menace to our environment and countries are not running effective policies to encourage recycling. In short, the are not a public awareness about the impact of these wastes on our environment and governments do not have solid policies to stop it.
On the other hand, our society have an excessive utilization of plastic and that generate uncontrolled volume of wastes. In daily life, plastic is in every place, covering vegetables, clothes, and bread. There are not a public aware about how we have an excessive use of it For example, latest scientific research warn about the high levels of plastic in oceans and how that is menacing sea-life. Thus, the current plastic problem is not a worldwide concern because, despite there a lot of campaigns on media, people is still using plastic everyday without relevant behaviour changes.
In order to deal with this problem, governments have an important role to regulate the massive production of garbage through restrictive laws to industry and shops. Besides, they should make compulsory the use of recycling materials in factories to re-use the plastic produced and decrease the their levels.
To conclude, the “use and throw” culture is the main cause of our excessive production of rubbish. Measures like obliged recycling it will be a relevant step to deal with this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
An urgent problem around the world is th...
^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... running effective policies to encourage recycling. In short, the are not a publi...
^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cies to encourage recycling. In short, the are not a public awareness about the impact...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
... have an excessive use of it For example, latest scientific research warn about the high...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...on media, people is still using plastic everyday without relevant behaviour changes. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay without relevant behaviour changes. In order to deal with this problem, gove...
^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...e-use the plastic produced and decrease the their levels. To conclude, the 'use ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22756410256 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75687048931 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544871794872 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0945293132 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0718359811129 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023199599942 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234177255252 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0401910623226 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225557339138 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.