The importance of natural world has recently come into focus by many scientists and naturalists alike since human being faced many predicaments in 21st century as water scarcity, species extinction on a massive scale and climate change. But scientists who are utterly aware of this continuous change on climate and its impact on natural environment failed to communicate effectively to public regarding the matter. To tackle the problem, several things needs to be done in shifting public opinion from inflicting any more serious damage on wildlife to persuading the necessity of environmental conservation.
People’s understanding of any phenomena pretty much depends on science and reasoning. Scientists seek to find scientific explanation or rational for any complexities they may encounter. Although scientists have already reached their limit in understanding the natural system and the way it works, they keep trying to analyze the climate change with existing statistical data. We cannot ignore the fact that science solved any complexity human failed to adhere any meaning to. However, there are issues that are beyond the reach of current technology and have intrinsic connection with universe, things like the presence of god, the spiritual development of human, the importance of ecosystem and love for another human being which people are well aware of and believe their existence. Natural environment is also one of those experiences that defy articulation.
So while scientists continue to advance in exploring the rational in nature, they need to leave room for mysterious and unexplainable, accepting their limit in knowing its full complexity. To illustrate the point, doctors inform the patients regarding the danger of cigarette smoking and its association with lung cancer, but they have no proof to justify their claim given the complexity of human body. They weigh this relation as matter of judgment which goes beyond any intellectual probability. Therefore, it is up to scientists to enlighten people concerning the danger they may come across and encourage the public in protecting their natural world.
This is true that scientists play an important role in directing people’s attention toward environmental conservation. But media can also create a culture that every person realize its full essential and importance which is pretty much a matter of faith.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51358695652 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98456048882 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58152173913 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8541168103 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.266666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17890093784 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601760181071 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514901686366 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118494390853 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436905034659 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.