Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for
personal growth. Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies
too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively.
Succesful people are those who work smartly and utilize every hour they work in most productive way. A person should view challenging situation as an oppurtunity for personal growth.
Viewing challenges as a neccessary hurdles in order to achieve success, and recognizing those hurdles is most important for personal growth. Some people believes that reimagining challenging situations occupies too much of focus. These peope think that reimagining challenging situation will waste time that could be better used to face challenges. They keep on working hard towards their goals and challenges, never recognizing things that could be making them slow and less efficient.
Additionally, most of achievers are good thinkers and doers. For ex, M.S.Dhoni who is regarded as on of the best captains india ever had, revealed in a interview that he thinks about gameplan a day before every match, what he and team will do, if one of his strategy fails. Mukesh Ambani, business tycoon of India realised that his company is undergoing financial crises, viewed the challenging situations as oppurtunity. He understood that Reliance Telecom revenue is going down, because of decline in number of consumers as Reliance Telecom was charing high price for mobile data. Mukesh realised the problem and opted for newest technology which was not used by any other mobile operator at that time, which made mobile data plan much cheaper leading to highest revenue year for the company in history.
On the contrary, overthinking about challenging situations will lead to waste of time and stress.We have seen so many people thinking more, working less. So yes, thinking about weaknesses and working on them is neccessary for personal growth, but not overthinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the achievers') or simply say ''most achievers''.
Suggestion: most of the achievers; most achievers
...low and less efficient. Additionally, most of achievers are good thinkers and doers. For ex, M....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Dhoni
...re good thinkers and doers. For ex, M.S.Dhoni who is regarded as on of the best capta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...s. For ex, M.S.Dhoni who is regarded as on of the best captains india ever had, re...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...st captains india ever had, revealed in a interview that he thinks about gameplan...
^
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...e mobile data plan much cheaper leading to highest revenue year for the company in history...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...s will lead to waste of time and stress.We have seen so many people thinking more,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30685920578 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74056920099 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9539259869 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267932706675 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110858905762 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134903378212 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171489545441 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908866475153 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.