The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares the revenue collected by meat, dairy products and international tourism in Someland for 2005 and 2015 also predicts for the future year 2025.
Overall, The tourism industry is imposing the maximum economy earlier also in the future and increases with a time interval. But, the dairy item sales fluctuate throughout the period, whereas meats are least consumed good during the period.
According to the graph, the meat products and dairy product collects 4 billion and approximately 5 billion of total economy respectively, where the tourism was significant and generate more than 6 billion funds in the year 2005. After 10 years, there was a gradual reduction in meat products to 4.5 billion, but the dairy items are more popular this year with just less than 8 billions of sales. In addition, tourism slightly invokes the revenue by 0.4 billion than the earlier year.
In Future, The tendency of meat economy will go down by half billion than 2005 and are the least prefered products by people. The dairy products will be the second popular item with relative sales of 7.8 billion and will decrease than in previous years. The foreigners will make more expenditure than earlier years and will be more famous as 2005 with just less than 8 billion in the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 billion'.
Suggestion: 8 billion
...e popular this year with just less than 8 billions of sales. In addition, tourism slightly in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the Future'?
Suggestion: In the Future
...y 0.4 billion than the earlier year. In Future, The tendency of meat economy will go d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97685185185 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45483464503 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8548233957 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0671844059206 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036115352557 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598890330225 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663037313186 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772959675525 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.