Benefits and problems of studying and work related to old theatre play in high schools. Give your opinion with examples.
Studying and researching an old school theatre in the educational curriculum has become a controversial issue all around the world. Although it is regarded by a considerable number of inhabitants as thoroughly constructive and positive yet others have opposite views. This essay will discuss both positives and negatives, and conclude why it is beneficial to teach this at schools.
The downside of such studies shows that it has many demerits among the pupils as they get distracted to other directions and cannot get the true value of the subject. A research conducted by a prestigious university shows that teaching these subjects has led the students to adapt to these cultures inappropriately in their modern lifestyle, and achieved some negative consequences. Hence, there should be a mechanism to judge that such studies are not destroying the student's lives.
There are several reasons why instructing or even considering old places including theatres, buildings, mosques and churches as an educational topic is advantageous. First and foremost, the pupils are getting to know their ancestors, history, and cultures. For example, these studies involve how and why such places were built, what purpose they served and how they were used afterward. This increases the general knowledge of the students about their history and they also comprehend the value of their national identity.
Although there are compelling reasons on both sides, I think teaching and working related to old theatres in educational institutes brings a lot of benefits and its positives outweigh the negatives associated with it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43426294821 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96752580869 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625498007968 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0578094655 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126247732421 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426572987988 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556443000307 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840753080565 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630368289538 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.