The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000.
The graph illustrated the comparison of fertility rate of women between bahrain, kuwait, qatar, oman, saudi arabia, as well as UAE from 1990 to 2000. Overall, in 2000 the number of fertility rate of woman in all countries lean to decline slightly. Furthermore, the uppermost fertility rate occurred in oman in 1990 which the average reached 7, and the nethermost occurred in bahrain in 2000, which the average was less than 3.
Moreover, in 2000 oman and saudi arabia had successful to degenerate their fertility rates in the same level which the average less than 6 respectively. On the other side, qatar which in 1990 was assigned as the third rank of the most fertility rates in gulf countries, it just enabled decreased their number of fertility rate minimally than others.
Finally, bahrain and kuwait which their number of fertility rates in 1990 was in the same level, in 2000 bahrain gravitates to be more progressive than kuwait which it had succeed to slump the number of fertility rates more than kuwait.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...re progressive than kuwait which it had succeed to slump the number of fertility rates ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...re progressive than kuwait which it had succeed to slump the number of fertility rates ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, moreover, so, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94186046512 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57234428311 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1393092202 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315796611507 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186994692135 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682539652793 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231955966905 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834075616543 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.