Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries, shops and on public transport. to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Today, there are many public places such as libraries, schools, shops, transportation vehicles and areas, etc. And, in this era which living us, there are so many technological equipment, tools, and other materials whose people have. These people use these devices quietly.
First of all, the public places such as parks, and universities where people share are everywhere in all countries. The most parts of them used by their residents, foreigner too. For example, some people do their sports in public stadiums, also another members of communities walk in the streets in their cities, another example is shopping for necessities which needed by people, and the last example if given by me is listening a lesson.
Also, in public places people would affect the other badly or positively. For instance, some students study often in the library with their classmates or alone because their productivity is more than another areas. And, their degrees would be a high for their the library workings, but if there would be noise students their levels could be a bad. So, these types of students either get these places out or their mouths would be closed.
In addition, there are many transportations types in cities including using a personal cars, subways or the public transportations, etc. Then, in crowded places the public vehicles are used regularly and often. Almost all people have mobile phones some of them use them in these vehicles which used by people, for that reason they sometimes cause vehicle's crashing.
Furthermore, a shopping is a general trade activity which implementing by people especially by women. And, there are a lot of shopping-malls in a big countries, and these malls would focus selling more products for their prices and costs. And, they usually use advertisements. But, in these malls there would be bad people who used a cell-phone noisily, and they impact the other customers negatively.
In conclusion, taking account of all above reasons and examples, there must be rules which let by people. Because, some of these people's behaviours influence others harshly. So, I definitely agree that statement mobile phones should be banned in public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much technological equipment', 'a good deal of technological equipment'.
Suggestion: much technological equipment; a good deal of technological equipment
... this era which living us, there are so many technological equipment, tools, and other materials whose peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'study'.
Suggestion: often study
...positively. For instance, some students study often in the library with their classmates or...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 151, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'country'?
Suggestion: country
...re are a lot of shopping-malls in a big countries, and these malls would focus selling mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impact the other customers negatively. In conclusion, taking account of all abo...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...here must be rules which let by people. Because, some of these peoples behaviours influ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22535211268 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71508967843 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.897807883 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313753589979 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10282480784 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081491523338 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171730354397 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550082178589 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.