In many countries, a small amount of people earn extremely high salaries, some people believe that this is good for country, but other think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Over the past few decades, some people believed that senior employees would receive more wage significantly than the other’s. While it would be reasonable income in some positions, I argued that the amount of remuneration should be controlled by the government.
There are various reason that can justify the high wages in companies. Firstly, the workers are interested in work hard and long because they are offered to gain much money. On the other hand, they would get more motivation to work from dawn to dust every day and are ready to neglect their pastime due to extra salary. Therefore, the government is able to fix more tax on their income which can be spent on vital activities such as reducing the poverty and other significant things. Furthermore, the talent university graduates are more likely to attend the jobs which have extremely high salary. As a result, they could drive the business successfully ,and the company will earn a large amount of benefit, consequently the economy will experience the perfect economic growth.
However, I would agree with those who maintain that the governors should introduce strict law to pay salary to the work force. In some firms, for instance, the executives receive high salary while new or unexperienced workers gain a low-level of money irrespective of the hours they have to work. It means that it would be better to reduce the amount of managers’ income and put some money on other people’s. Not only do their colleagues think it would be fair but also they increase their attempt to cooperate. Moreover, the authority ,instead of poverty, spend the budget on other vital condition such as infrastructure and hospitals. In addition to, all people will be better off and general population will experience an improved standard of living.
To conclusion, it would be rational that the some rules are fixed not to permit companies paying more than a certain salary to individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Firstly, the workers are interested in work hard and long because they are offe...
^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey could drive the business successfully ,and the company will earn a large amount...
^^
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a large amount of benefit, consequently the economy will experience the perfect ...
^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pt to cooperate. Moreover, the authority ,instead of poverty, spend the budget on ...
^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...nclusion, it would be rational that the some rules are fixed not to permit companies...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09937888199 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80975589912 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2750598329 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160347355641 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527406262129 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343782167893 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101683055547 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328068805056 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.