Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people, in their relationship, want their partners to tell the truth in any circumstances. Crowd thus propose that people must consider telling the truth in their relationships always. While the community has undoubtedly a tendency to seek confidence, I agree with the statement that it is the most important consideration in any relationship.
Firstly, trust is the most crucial element in any relationship. Human beings are social animals who live together and communicate with each other. As the structures of man-kind populations, indeed complex, are willing to be in a safe area. Thus, trustworthy individuals became good candidates in a relationship. In other words, a person whose prior consideration is honesty are regarded as a trustworthy person, and a good partner. Even though in some situations, people think that small and harmless lies won’t affect the relationship with others, they ruin the trust between people as well as their relationship. Living in a complex structure requires, consequently, to be honest, and trustworthy toward their environment to being accepted. Therefore, people must always be honest and tell the truth in any relationship in society.
Secondly, honesty would decrease remarkably, the number of fights between friends. Whereas, regard is the main medium in the conversations. Particularly, a large number of fights resulted from people who lie repeatedly, in serious situations. Honesty, for example, is preferred genuinely, in new friend choice. Since people avoid an unnecessary argument in friendships, they make new friends with ones who they won’t argue much, indeed, with whom people always tell the truth. Additionally, unlike a lie, the truth helps people to understand each other better. Consequently, not only friends don’t judge each other without understanding, but also arguments would be less between them. If friends, thus, would quit telling lies, indeed always telling the truth, relationships would become durable and trusted.
In conclusion, trust should be one of the main considerations of any relationship in which a complex structured of the human population, indeed, individuals seek honesty in their mate selection. As lying in a serious situation is one of the main reasons for fights between friends, telling the truth would increase the confidence and result in a reduction in the number of arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...elling the truth in their relationships always. While the community has undoubtedly a ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., the number of fights between friends. Whereas, regard is the main medium in the conve...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ium in the conversations. Particularly, a large number of fights resulted from people who lie rep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5597826087 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16912608039 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535326086957 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.316162354 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52380952381 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240168860712 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751842268633 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738162309011 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168692327685 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744290179038 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.