Although for our, humankind, current population growth and development society, I believe that nature is way more important than our civilization. Therefore, in my humble opinion, I disagree with the given statement that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Firstly, there are already excess urban areas due to our enormous civilization. The society was built firstly in rural areas and expanded to the cities. Most of the time we get used to this situation and appreciate this development. However, this draws a curtain over our eyes, and cannot understand how extensive the construction is happening around us. For example, almost 40% of Istanbul's houses are empty, due to some businessmen's craving for money. In fact, they needed to light up those apartments so that government won't take over their rights in the field. Could you see another problem that this excess urbanization cause to the environment? Therefore, there is no need to occupy more countryside area. Secondly, the environmental consequences of this act are not only harmful to endangered animals but also to many forests that are home to trees that provide us oxygen to live. Oxygen is our main source of energy production in the body biologically. However, when the body couldn't be provided with oxygen, then death is inevitable. In fact, due to deforestation and the building industry, the air of the cities is bear breathable. Last but not least, nature always tends to be in balance and diverse. If humankind dominates over the earth, nature finds a way to increase diversity, which could be thought that this way includes destroying the human society that we built without considering natural consequences. Overall, although some people think that reserving lands is less important than farmlands, housing and industry, I utterly believe that nature should be considered first. In fact, if the consequences of our society harm and try to destroy nature, it will astonishingly wipe out the humankind in a single day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...dy biologically. However, when the body couldnt be provided with oxygen, then death is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19219219219 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88190987083 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5536159179 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0555555556 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239623337809 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630455840548 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879414712923 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239623337809 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.