the table below shows the expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002.
The table compares advertising budgets of four automobile manufacturing companies in the UK in 2002. Among the four, Renault evidently spent the greatest amount on advertisement altogether. Figures also indicate a pattern, featuring TV as the most invested form of promotion while the opposive was true for cinema.
The most impressive set of data belongs to TV, which was the primary form of advertising for all four companies. Cetirizine paid upto 70 million dollars for it, which is followed by investments of Vauxhall and Renault (65 million and 59 million, respectively), while Rover only spent 35 million. However, whereas Renault and Rover allocated comparatively significant amounts of money on press promotion (45 million and 38 million dollars), the other two paid much less: $12 million by Cetirizine and $8 by Vauxhall.
Interestingly, radio advertising attracted the same amount of investment, 15 million dollars, from all 4 companies. The last two forms were less important. $7 million was budgeted for outdoor promotion by Renault and Vauxhall, which was more than double the amounts spent by Rover and Cetirizine. Similarly, cinema only attracted Renault and Vauxhall, which paid 6 and 5 million dollars for promotion and negligible amounts from the other two.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d much less: 2 million by Cetirizine and by Vauxhall. Interestingly, radio ...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Million
...he last two forms were less important. million was budgeted for outdoor promotion by R...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...he last two forms were less important. million was budgeted for outdoor promotion by R...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99206940742 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580808080808 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8392844621 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0677752155106 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465998954008 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106845741877 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722793050616 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910842077302 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.