The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021.

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021.

The four pie charts illustrates the age contribution of european citizens in 1901, 1941, 1981 and 2021.

Generally, the total population is predicted to increase during 120 years period. Life-span of human kind is typically improved as anticipated with 6% of people who aged above 85, and the groups of middle-age also rise with the expectation at 15% in 2021.

Specifically, the total population was estimated to climbed significantly from 38,225,000 in 1901 to 52,335,000 in 1941. The figures of these two years are the same with only 1% of people whose age is over 85, 4% of the middle-age, and 95% of people younger than 65.

However, there is a disparity in those figures in 1981. Particularly, the number of the overall european’s population accounted for 67,180,000, which is nearly two times higher than the number in 1901. The majority of population was still people under 65 years old, which took up 83%, although such percentage decreased dramatically in compared to those percentage recorded between 1901 and 1941. The proportion of people who aged from 65 to 85 was tripled into 13% as well as that proportion of citizen whose age over 85 is quadruped in the same time.

Additionally, in 2021, it is forecasted that the overall population of the european will be increased to 87,658,000 with nearly 80% young populations, 6% of elderly, and 15% of the rest.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-15 trpg143 78 view
2019-07-11 Thu Phung 67 view
2019-03-27 Tracy Nguyen 56 view
2019-01-26 tuanly 73 view
Essays by user trpg143 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 245, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...1. The majority of population was still people under 65 years old, which took up 83%, ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 354, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this percentage' or 'those percentages'?
Suggestion: this percentage; those percentages
...e decreased dramatically in compared to those percentage recorded between 1901 and 1941. The pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, as well as, as well as that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04329004329 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98419466766 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3608118005 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212075177853 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087546352319 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585101006894 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130976093427 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645315506225 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.