The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a never-ending debate about traffic congestions and all possible solutions to tackle this major problem. Some people tend to believe that the only way to decline the traffic jam is to reduce the necessitate of commuting for routines task such as going to workplace, shopping, and going to schools or universities. I totally disagree with this idea because I think there is a variety of solutions such as improvement of public transportation system, promotion of infrastructure and city plan, and imposing some restricts laws, to deal with this matter.
To begin with, it should be stuck in the mind that the main reason of this volume of traffic jams contribute to the increasing number or single-passenger cars. In fact, most of the people prefer to use their own cars to commute. According to the recent statistics, the first reason is the dissatisfaction of people with public transportation system including subway, taxies or buses. It is obvious that a modern and also a cheap transportation system with a regular time table will play a vital role in reduction of traffic volume.
On the other and, the possible solutions are not restricted to the promotion of public transportation systems. Other potential tasks include development of infrastructure. To illustrate, wider streets or less crowded areas would be an effective way to decrease the traffic. To address this, city planning need to be done with some specific approaches.
Another thing that is noteworthy is the role of government in setting some standards and punishment-oriented laws about the amount of emissions and also limitation for entry some areas. For example, the annual check-up for cars should be obligatory or private cars should be banned to enter the central parts of the city.
In conclusion, I believe that reduction the need to commuting for work, shopping and education is not the only way to decline the traffic volume and there are other effective methods to tackle this problem. A modern and cheap public transportation, a well-designed city plan and enforcement of related laws will lead to less traffic jams. Given this situation, it seems the solutions for traffic lie in different aspects and is a long-term procedure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | Ronald88 | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | Padma Jha | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Alina18092000 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- Cricket has become more popular than the national sports in the sub-continental countries.What do you think are the reasons behind this? 67
- The table shows the proportion of female and male aged 15 and aged 75 from 1911 to 2001 in the UK 75
- Some people think that giving their children a certain amount of money every week will help them have fewer financial problems in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 73
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem. Do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...to decline the traffic jam is to reduce the necessitate of commuting for routines task such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 45, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need to commute'?
Suggestion: need to commute
...onclusion, I believe that reduction the need to commuting for work, shopping and education is not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, another thing, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11001630622 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508241758242 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1129973161 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170742178922 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525859165256 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497086844936 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937117313987 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469508736769 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.