The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information and by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of the inhabitants aged 65 and over from 1940 to now and prevision to 1940 in Japan, USA, and Sweden. The general overview here is that the proportion of people aged 65 and over in all three countries always tends to follow an upward trend.
To specify, in the USA, after a slight climb from 9% in 1940 to 10% in 1960. The rate of old people went up considerably to 15% in 1980, before a light dip to 14% in 2020. For 20 years from 2020 and 2040, the rate will increase sharply to 23%. Similarly, Sweden witnessed a gradual rise from 6.5% in 1940 to 14% i...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-05 | wardiati | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Jasmineeee | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | soxmomomo | 89 | view |
| 2017-02-16 | chinnusalas | 67 | view |
| 2016-01-31 | Irani | view |
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work and travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 65
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 94
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 80
- The diagrams below show the stages in the erosion of a headland Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 216 200
No. of Characters: 914 1000
No. of Different Words: 108 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.834 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.231 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.543 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.756 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.407 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4