Leadership no doubts play a critical role for achievement in group activities. Strong leaders with good and proper strategies and decision making are crucial to being successful in societies. Now the question is where the source of this leadership ability is. Some people believes leadership is educable, others would disagree. I personally agree with the statement and believe leadership is a natural skill. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and example justifying my point of view.
First, facing the events are complex and unpredictable. In critical moments leaderships should make a decision that have not prepared for. Therefore, making this decision which are unpredictable is impossible to be learned. It means leaders have specific psychological characteristics which cannot be imitated and learned. If we review the books and article in leadership field, we noticed that suggestion are so general and not specific for every moments. For example, always revolution leadership has a powerful speech requires both the mind and the spirit to come up with. This speech is used to deliver a strong message with the purpose of influencing people and providing inspiration for uprising. None of revolution leadership learned from books how to stimulate people by specific words. In the moment of speaking, It is significant that their statements come from their internal not from books. This clearly indicate that leadership ability is intrinsic.
The second reason is that just as some people possess natural athletic ability or artistic talent, some people have the self-confidence, intuition, energy and intelligence to become natural leaders. These abilities of leading other people is obvious in children behavior when they are playing. In childhood where there is not absolute source of learning such as books, media or school, children naturally play different roll in games based on their desires. For instance, when I was a child we gathered in my grandmother house, I played with my cousins. I almost tended to choose what game to do or how we play. I am not older than my cousins but always without any discussion they agreed with my opinion. At the end, we all had great time. It don’t know how, but if feel right for me to do that. This example shows leadership abilities such as decision making and confidence lead to work in a team, and work collaboratively with others come naturally.
To sum up, though, some may disagree with my opinions, but I deeply believe that leadership ability cannot be gained. Unpredictability of events and children behavior means leadership come naturally. I think society decision maker should pay more attention to this statement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93548352107 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553775743707 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.53933937 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1428571429 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6071428571 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238481305579 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608438459255 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477172097467 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159313821466 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351407249036 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.