TPO43
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, leaders have played a dominant role in decision situations. leaders ' talk and their offers usually have an impact on people's decisions. But what shall we do if some of their speeches are incorrect? There is a fruitful discussion which encompasses the different argues amount academicians. some people are inclining toward that we can say nothing and just listen to him or her, whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective and we should interrupt him and give the correct information. Anyway, some other people might maintain that we should not choose these ways and you can aware.... inform.... your teacher or your boss after the meeting. I think it is dependent on the situation. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will explicate my opinion through the most outstanding reasons and provide some details which can aptly elucidate my perspective.
The first prominent point to be mention is that making a good decision in critical situation have a significant and undeniable role in one or companies' success. Sometimes make a morsel mistake can cause abundant problems for everyone. In Sharif university of Tehran, one of the most prestigious universities in my country, a very notable research conducted recently regarding wrong decisions are made by leaders' speeches. this study shows some awesome statistics which revealed that around 30% of the wrong decisions in investment markets because of wrong information, which leaders said.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that some details are not important. if you interrupt your teacher or your boos at the meeting, it causes some confusing and misunderstand with the audience. For instance, When I was working as a manager of a control project for a building company for 3years, one day, correct the wrong information about the number of audience at the meeting made a bad space for me.
In the aforementioned, the reasons let us to the conclusion that dependent on situations and critical information, you can interrupt or take a different decision. it is always good to think about your actions and calculate your actions' effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...a dominant role in decision situations. leaders talk and their offers usually have an ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant role in decision situations. leaders talk and their offers usually have an im...
^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...e different argues amount academicians. some people are inclining toward that we can...
^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...decisions are made by leaders speeches. this study shows some awesome statistics whi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...is that some details are not important. if you interrupt your teacher or your boos...
^^
Line 13, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...interrupt or take a different decision. it is always good to think about your acti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, if, regarding, so, whereas, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30409356725 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91561963648 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1861394735 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184975915319 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548277651675 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487813941582 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102978590187 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036192219469 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.