Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Nowadays, due to the complexities of modern life, all people must have an exact goal and a time schedule to follow their goals. Education is on the top of every ones goals. In the current situation, having a good educational background considered the key of success in a person's life. Ego, according to my point of view, I believe all parents nowadays encourage their children to have the best educational achievements than the previous time. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite to be mentioned is that parents realized the value of education in the modern era. Some people, especially in my society, are suffering from illiteracy, and do they not adhere that their children have the same problem in their live. As I am the witness in my society, most of the people have noting even to eat, but they work in worst scenario and earn money to pay for their children's education expenses.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that people believe that everything in the current circumstances is rely on new technology achievements. Nowadays, people are not looking for dissolving unsophisticated problems, but they are scrutinizing on the trouble issues like, finding a solution for reducing greenhouse effects, or introduce an alternative for fossil fuels. Therefore, for drawing a bright future live for their children, people focus on their education.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, in the current modern life, people in order to survive the current economic climate, concentrate to their kids education achievements. They believe that everything is rely on new technology, and in order to not emerged they should be updated.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ound considered the key of success in a persons life. Ego, according to my point of vie...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
... have noting even to eat, but they work in worst scenario and earn money to pay for thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...rything in the current circumstances is rely on new technology achievements. Nowaday...
^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...ements. They believe that everything is rely on new technology, and in order to not ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, therefore, in brief

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19014084507 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99482129225 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8351819602 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.384615385 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133183182749 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524854474524 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433881332961 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810027270171 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483442507548 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.