Nowadays, films are no longer made by big companies only. Digital technology enables everybody to produce films. Do you think it is positive or negative development?
Nowadays technology has been developed to a greater extent in various fields across the world. This has led to more opportunities for film-making personnel at the low state or people without a cinema background. In this essay, I will discuss the positives of producing movies by small-scale groups.
Firstly, the feasibility of high-tech accessories for producing a movie is helpful for individuals who cannot afford in large-scale cinema production. To add on, it directs and encourages youngsters to exhibit their talents in directing a movie and extending their place in the market. For example, there are many famous directors who have started their career on YouTube by making short films which have spread worldwide and laid as a foundation to reach their destiny today. Henceforth, this development of digital technology is helping people in poverty to submit their documentaries and get approval to release the story with good quality.
Secondly, the number of users using the internet these days has grown dramatically over the past years. This has allowed the film industry to reach their audience more easily through online advertising and by the use of social networks such as Facebook, YouTube Facebook is a huge marketing advantage for filmmakers because of the ability for information to be spread virally on it within minutes. For instance, Hollywood short clips are made famous due to the fast release of scenes in social media rather than telecasting it after several months. Therefore, digital technology has is useful in many ways by slumping the cost, time and effort of the cinema team.
To conclude, in my opinion, the merits of developed technology is always surging in the current scenario and helping the low socio-economic group to get their prerogative by showing their talents to the public.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29692832765 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84629770339 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3108929663 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101193784488 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402854701615 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294340284716 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649622956327 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222034052997 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.