The given table provides information on the modification of silk production in England and Wales by comparing the number of their factories and workers from 1851 to 1901.
Overall, discernable adjustments were witnessed decade by decade. Also, it is evident that while the number of silk factories continuously expanded, that of workers, however, showed a considerable reduction throughout the second half of the twentieth century.
Turning into detail, in 1861, the figure of manufacturers generating silk reached the peak of 761, which was almost 3 times higher than its number at the beginning of the period, with 272 factories. However, a moderate decrease was displayed by exactly 68 units reduced by 1871, before mildly gained to 702 factories for the next decade. Throughout the remainders of the period, silk factories were gradually restricted, presented by the number of 623 in 1901.
In contrast, a downward trend was observed in the number of British employees working at those factories: started at 130750 workers estimated in 1851, it constantly dropped to about one third in 1901, with 38942 individuals. In addition, the number female labourers was significantly higher than male workers, reflected by the figures counted in 1851 of 76786 and 53964, respectively. By the end of the period, this tendency durably maintained in considered factories with 13375 men and 25567 women participating in silk production.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42410714286 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98037466292 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4572203859 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227315749018 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925832262481 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861627988234 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155150127909 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879335431393 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.