Today we are free to work and live wherever we want due to the development of technology in connecting people and travelling around. While taking the advantages, we also need to think about the opposite sides.
Development of communication technology enables people from anywhere to communicate with anyone in the world. For example, some Internet companies allow their employees to work remotely for part-time or even permanently. However, there are some concerns from the workers. They are worried about their promotions as they can hardly get attention from their managers and bosses under the remote circumstances. Another example, online teaching is happening now during the lockdown of the coronavirus by using video softwares like Zoom. Students can take courses at home though they may prefer a full learning experience on campus.
Regarding development of transportation, it facilitates people moving faster. In other words, we have more freedom to travel no matter how long the distance. Recently advanced technologies such as high speed trains have shortened our traveling time. In the city, the underground system is a security of commuting time. Moreover, airplanes make far destinations to arrive within one day. The only drawback is that frequently used transportation systems are increasing the carbon emission, which relatively leads to the issue of global warming.
In conclusion, although the advantages of communication technology and transportation obviously weigh more than the disadvantages, people should take the downside into consideration. Generally, such development provides us more freedom but there are various problems from uncertainty of promotion, unsatisfied learning and climate change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a full learning experience on campus. Regarding development of transportation,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74708171206 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13180990505 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684824902724 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5547534529 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278230477898 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741002495508 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957209106958 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149055077483 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238244303694 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.