The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given the table which sets out data about the proportion of water utility 6 of countries in the year 2003. Figures are registered for domestic, industrial, and agricultural sectors.
At first glance, in the researching time, domestic water usage was not as much as the two other segments. Whatsmore, china's agriculture used up the largest water percentage at 87% while 2% was utilized by Australia as the least water proportion contrasting to the whole table.
Looking at the graph in more detail, Domestic water was mostly used in Australia and the least in China, with 65% and 6% respectively. The table also provides information that Canada employed the most extravagant water percentage for industrialization progresses among stated countries. Meanwhile, Australia only spent 2% in the same category. In the same way, China consumed 87% of water for agricultural use, which was the highest percentage of water usage not only in the above-mentioned sector but also in contrast to the whole given table. Additionally, the UK's 4% of water employment proportion was the tiniest fracture used in cultivating. What is also striking is Russia's 62% industrial water usage, turkey's 73% agricultural water, etc... which are all overwhelmingly high numbers adjacent to Canada's 8% cultivating water utility and Turkey's 16% water consumed for the domestic sphere.
Overall, industrial and agricultural water applications had pretty similar patter, while domestic purposes used up less water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
... Looking at the graph in more detail. generally, Domestic water was mostly used in Aust...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49130434783 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08929794852 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.7496750505 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150416955589 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593857921124 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451660397356 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100898719569 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014542555623 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.