In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, public transportation has been one of the popular trends for individuals in order to commute through cities. Some people argue that governments’ funding should be allocated to develop current transport. While, others claim that a great deal of money should be spent to build up-to-date railway ways for high speed trains. I myself concur with constructing modern and fast public transport.
To commence with, by improving existing facilities in public transport, both authorities and citizens have gained some benefits. For governors, the most significant one is that this measure has not required a great deal of budget and also trouble. In fact, because the base form of transport has been existed, less amount of money would be needed. Moreover, for upgrading present facilities, has not been obligatory to alter the whole infrastructure, as all have been built before. Therefore, they have not gotten into trouble in order to use great numbers of work forces and experts to design and change all the existing construction. Furthermore, one considerable advantage for people is that they have not had to pay a great amount of tax for constructing new transport.
On the other hand, people who have argued to construct new facilities such as fast trains, have considered significant aspects. In modern world, with crowded cities, there has been a need to change old public transportation in order to not only commute faster, but also to have more numbers of trains. This has given people the opportunity to increase safety during their commute and moreover to spend less amount of time on transport. In addition, building new facilities could benefit the environment such as trains which could be able to release less amount of fossil fuels. Consequently, the atmosphere would be in better condition in term of having fewer greenhouse gases and contamination.
In conclusion, however, it has been easier to develop recent public transport facilities. I have claimed that by building new vehicles, not only our environment may obtain some benefits, but also our travel between cities would be safer and more appropriate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of tax for constructing new transport. On the other hand, people who have argue...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26453488372 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89434318717 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4407675163 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.529411765 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281016382559 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090791987808 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509855146824 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176873143489 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625283334726 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.