Archeological artifacts
In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates that exploration and discovery of archeological findings encounter huge obstacles in the United Kingdom, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. On the other hand, the professor states that since 1990, establishment of guidelines improved the past situation and changed the previous scenarios and gainsays each of the arguments mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting
that due to the advancement of society many construction projects were initiated, which had not only caused the demise of rare artifacts but also damaged the recently discovered archeological sites. Nonetheless, the lecture maintains that now before starting any construction project, the construction sites are carefully examined. If the sites hold valuable findings, the local government officials make plans to save them by building and excavating them. Moreover, complete documentation of the sites is started.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points out that government findings are ruled out in new guidelines, as the construction companies mostly play a major role in supporting the financial costs, to preserve the historical artifacts. These companies pay for the constructions, initial examinations, and all the working processes. This really extends the research projects to a far greater range of sites. These claims refute the writer’s implication that only the government is responsible for the provision of the funding which really restricts the research to limited sites only. That is because financial support is not adequate to carry out archeological research projects.
Ultimately, the article wraps its arguments by declaring that a career in Archeology is not only limited but also not well established. The speaker in the listening rebuts this point by
insisting that things are progressively improved by the provision of paid work to archeologists. Many more job opportunities in archeology fields are available now. Archeologists are hired for making preservation plans, doing scientific research, and writing reports. All in all, the Archeology profession is now regarded highest than ever before.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71028037383 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10293510212 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591900311526 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7154384875 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5625 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192493021224 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520198657168 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705492502125 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701669877856 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526325966955 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 63.6247240618 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.7273730684 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.