Big companies are increasingly investing in an array of campaigns focusing on boosting sales. Some problems have resulted from this tendency, and they need to be tackled by individuals as well as the government as a whole.
To begin with, several related problems can be anticipated when large enterprises allocate their resources to marketing and promotion. Firstly, the cost of marketing tends to be high, which increases the product price. As a result, the customers have to pay more for the same product. Secondly, if these organizations offer discounts for their goods, smaller local shops will be faced with losses in sales. This will lead to the reduced total avenue or even bankruptcy in case that there is unlikelihood to cover the running costs, such as staff salaries and facility costs.
However, the government and individuals should take steps immediately to address these problems. First, the entrepreneurs of local companies should gain in popularity by engaging in social responsibilities. For example, they necessitate taking part in environmental services or charity activities, thereby not only contributing to society but also getting supports from public and being of benefits for their own enterprises. In addition, it is necessary for the authorities to give incentives and also raise people’s awareness of consuming local brands. Take, for instance, Vietnam, which used to expand the campaign named “ Vietnamese people uses Vietnamese commodities”, thus helping domestic businesses gradually affirm their standings in today’s highly competitive market. Finally, in order to make local products become more attractive and useful, such these commodities need to experience a significant turnaround by improving ranging from the appearance to quality.
In conclusion, there are various negative consequences of the gravitation towards buying products through marketing and promotion, and appropriate actions need to be produced to deal with these problems by the government coupled with the residents in particular. Although the issues are unlikely to be entirely eliminated in the short term, there are concrete steps to reduce the effects it is having on the current society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60416666667 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06413950284 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9690390603 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287705802837 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828172002049 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520987955336 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156266741739 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335817878758 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.