Friends or colleagues sometimes need to have a serious talk about a problem such as misunderstanding. Some people prefer to have these important discussions in a public place. Others prefer to have such talks in more private places or at home. Which do you prefer?
Every relationship sometimes comes to the verge of conflict. Whether it comes to question it is better to solve our arguments in a private or a public place, some people prefer the former one, but I feel it is better to discuss our issues in public places. The following paragraph will illustrate my perspective.
First, the more private place, the less I am in control of my emotions. To clarify, there is no restriction to our negative emotions to be expressed in private places. We experience a roller coaster of emotions in such conflict and quickly become angry, hurting our relationship. On the other hand, being observed by many strangers in a public place, we try to put a curb on our toxic emotions.
The second reason I would like to bring about is that public places provide people with a better environment, which helps to mitigate tension and stress. When we go to a public place, we have more options, from parks with many beautiful scenes and fresh air to coffee shops or restaurants playing light music. Therefore, a public place affords a great atmosphere where gives us peace of mind, and we present our problems more efficiently.
To wrap it up, I think public places are better for discussions as they give a sense of control over our emotions and provide a calming situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, i feel, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 1977.66487455 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 226.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7610619469 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71263118066 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 618.680645161 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1281005922 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8181818182 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23205048136 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788193444096 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474085291253 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128882047806 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394865319804 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.