Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

There different opinions on whether it is better for workers and labors to do a single task during the day or they should be assorted and be able to do various duties. Though some people think that doing a sole task, or on the other word being mono-task, help workers to concentrate better and be more useful for the company, I bleieve otherwise, maintaining that it is necessary for workers to be multi-functional for the sake of their own satisfaction and company prosperity. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.

Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is versatility makes labors perform better and more efficiently. Humans are not machine, they need diversity during their days in both their lives and jobs. They need to switch between different tasks to help their brain rest and give it a time to analyze the previous duty. Drawing from my own experience when I study for an exam, every two hours, I stop studying my exam, consider it for example chemistry, and switch to another book, for instance, mathematic. By this, I give some time to my brain to analyze and assort the brand-new information I have learned from chemistry. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests that versatility help workers perform better and as a result, their self-satisfaction will increase.

Although the prevous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some points here is that labors, by doing different tasks, become more expert in various fields. Take a power plant company as an example. Power plant company, just as other companies, has a team of technician as well as a team of engineers. If an engineer of this company become familiar to work with machineries, in a case of failure, he does not have to rely on technician and can fix the problem by himself. Hence, he sees himself more than a primary engineer as he can do theoritical calculation as well as practical tasks. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that being able to do various duties improve workers satisfaction and skill.

All in all, many favor are in favor of mono-task workers because they think in this way workers can better focous on their given tasks. Nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that multi-functionality is necessary and beneficical for both companies and workers; this is because in this way labors perform more efficiently and they improve their skills.

Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun favor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many favors'.
Suggestion: many favors
... satisfaction and skill. All in all, many favor are in favor of mono-task workers becau...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00476190476 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91701164141 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0495856097 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.647058824 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241968165075 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731996814786 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629803733599 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143889168487 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416647221456 0.0645574589148 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.