Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage

The reading and lecturer are both about whether the girl in the painting is Jane Austen or not.The author of the reading states that nobody knows about the Austen appearance and the only accepted painting of adult Austen is the painting by her sister Cassendra however the full length professional painting of teen age girl is in sale now. Although it is not entitled as Jane Austen, the subject is thought to be of her. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the claim and attacks each of the reason made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that her portrait was authorized to use as illustration after her demise so her family decendents are claiming the portrait. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that the portrait was authorized after 70 years of her death therefore the family who are claiming the painting might not have known and seen her in real life.
Secondly, the girl in painting is identical to adult Austen painted by her sister Cassandra which depicts Austen. In addition, the feature like face, nose, eyebrow, shape of body and so on in the painting exactly matches with adult Austen. The speaker on other hand points out that since Austen had joint family and there were many cousins who were of teen age, the girl in the painting might resemble any one of them instead. Furthermore, there are few instances to prove the painting to be of her niece..
Finally, the reading passage also notes that although the painting date was not known, the style of painting is directly linked to the society painter that the affluent family like Austen would hire. Moreover, the artist was also active duirng the time when Austen was a teenage girl. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that the stamp on back of canvas mentioned the portrait was sketched by another artist who was active when Austen was 21 years old. In addition, he started selling painting when she was 27 years old. Therefore, this clearly shows the the girl in the picture is not Austen.
As we can see, the author and speaker holds conflicting views on the portrait whether it is of Austen or not. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argumnet.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-14 Astha101 3 view
2023-07-14 Astha101 3 view
2023-07-14 Astha101 3 view
2023-05-16 hapsh 3 view
2023-05-03 prakriti malla 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user prakriti malla :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...l in the painting is Jane Austen or not.The author of the reading states that nobod...
^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e only accepted painting of adult Austen is the painting by her sister Cassendra ...
^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
...he full length professional painting of teen age girl is in sale now. Although it is no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h professional painting of teen age girl is in sale now. Although it is not entit...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
...and there were many cousins who were of teen age, the girl in the painting might resembl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instances to prove the painting to be of her niece.. Finally, the reading passag...
^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...o prove the painting to be of her niece.. Finally, the reading passage also note...
^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ears old. Therefore, this clearly shows the the girl in the picture is not Austen. As ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ears old. Therefore, this clearly shows the the girl in the picture is not Austen. As ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vely challenges the writer’s argumnet.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 10.4613686534 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80678851175 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38833615628 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488250652742 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4759965996 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8947368421 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0542740904383 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212622535999 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305537355489 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0296116667416 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034609405396 0.0443174109184 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.