The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen

Essay topics:

The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the measure of a great nation is by the achievements in different fields or by its people's welfare. Indisputably, welfare may be an indication of people's conveniences in a nation. Nevertheless, the developed nations are usually known by the number of achievements in different fields. Thus, I would argue that the general welfare cannot be considered the surest indicator of a great nation and would argue that a great nation is the one who has a bigger number in contributions in different fields.
First of all, the bigger number of contributions of a nation, the more expectation of knowledge spread among people in that nation. I would like to point out that the country who give the education the first priority, it should get talents people in different fields. To illustrate further, let us look at the example of developed country like U.S.A. and another developing one like Egypt. In the first one, you can find a big support to the education and research. In contrary with the second one, A poor support to the education. In this circumstance, significant contribution and big number of achievement of the first country's rulers, artists, and scientists.
Furthermore, a great nation can be defined the nation who helps a lot in developing human's life. Look at different aspects of life, its scientists make a good innovation and have new discoveries. Artists invent new ways to make people enjoy their life. Both common sense and personal experience have told us the great nation people are always productive then other nations people.
On the other hand, welfare may be an indicator of how people have facilities in their life. But it can't be an indicator of the greatness of a nation. For instance, Golf countries have a lot of money that help them to get all luxuries in their lives. They are wealthy and importing other nations technology or achievements to help them. One cannot consider them as great nations. They are dependent on others.
In conclusion, although the welfare may be importnat for people to live well, it cannot be considered as an indicator of a great nations. the greatness is measured by how this nation present to others.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-12 smithsonite79 66 view
2019-11-05 Roshan Dhakal 50 view
2019-10-27 sushil koirala 70 view
2019-10-24 tomalika khan 50 view
2019-10-19 manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user SSSASSS1 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in contributions in different fields. First of all, the bigger number of contr...
^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d one, A poor support to the education. In this circumstance, significant contribu...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... productive then other nations people. On the other hand, welfare may be an ind...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e have facilities in their life. But it cant be an indicator of the greatness of a n...
^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...e have facilities in their life. But it cant be an indicator of the greatness of a n...
^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s. They are wealthy and importing other nations technology or achievements to help them...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nations. They are dependent on others. In conclusion, although the welfare may ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'nation'?
Suggestion: nation
...e considered as an indicator of a great nations. the greatness is measured by how this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...red as an indicator of a great nations. the greatness is measured by how this natio...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95174262735 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8836169997 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458445040214 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1996750368 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9545454545 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195973837585 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616530665634 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445349228392 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112530735592 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419783500404 0.0667264976115 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.