Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

Essay topics:

Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

This topic raises the controversial issue of whether endangered species should be saved by society only if the extinction come from the human activities or not. Indisputably, human activities are the main factor causing extinction of those endangered species. Nevertheless, there are a lot of different parameters that threat this species. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that those species should only saved against human activities and would argue that the society should also save these endangered species against all other factors.
First of all, human activities usually are the main dangerous source for these spices. I would like to point out that other factors having effect also is a result from human activities. To illustrate further, let us look at the example of cutting trees on the wood. In this circumstance, many species are endangered and due to change in its life condition, it is more probably that many of them disappears. Consequently, there should be efforts to save those endangered species against human activities.
Furthermore, many of those endangered species usually are rare species. They represent a national wealth that should be preserved. Society should pass laws to save them. Saving them require providing the same natural places safe.
In addition to human activities, there are other factors that effect on those species such as climate changes. There should be efforts to save them against different factors. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that there are other factors affecting the endangered species other than human activities.

In conclusion, although, the human activities are a main source of extinction of endangered species, society should make efforts to save the endangered species against all factors not only coming from human activities. The potential extinction of many species has many reasons.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This topic raises the controversial issu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red species against all other factors. First of all, human activities usually a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...s. First of all, human activities usually are the main dangerous source for these spi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered species against human activities. Furthermore, many of those endangered sp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oviding the same natural places safe. In addition to human activities, there a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...species other than human activities. In conclusion, although, the human activ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45117845118 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76698034116 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47138047138 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2353562337 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9444444444 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334582585004 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121749860616 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896453653406 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224907199598 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609070728653 0.0667264976115 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.