Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

Essay topics:

Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

The earth is for all creatures, and humans should not presume that they own the planet, and they can exploit the other creatures. The prompt suggests that society should protect those endangered species that are at the risk of extinction due to the consequences of human activities. I mostly disagree with the prompt and will elucidate my position with three reasons.

Firstly, human activities like hunting, deforestation, polluting water bodies, climate change, etc., are the main causes for many vulnerable species (those species which are at the risk of extinction) today. Humans are directly or indirectly associated with the vulnerability of such species. It is very hard to determine which species are directly affected by human activities and which species are not. Since the biggest benefiters of this planet are humans, they have this duty to preserve all the creatures living in it and should make every possible effort to save them. For example, tigers in India decline substantially in the 2000s, and their decline is due to less fertility among the tigers of that region. Tiger is the national animal of India, and the government of India took every possible action to save them. They made policies that eventually result in saving the tiger, and today, India has the highest population of tigers in the world. We need our future generation to see such magnificent animals; otherwise, it would be a shame if they learn about these creatures from books.

Secondly, some species risk of extinction may be due to some avoidable factors like scarcity of food, climate, habitat issue, etc., and they can be easily preserved by providing them their natural habitat. This can be easily done by shifting them to the national wildlife forest or sanctuaries. So, if such actions can help in preserving those species, there should be no discussions on whether their extinctions are due to humans or not. This is like the same as if someone is dying in front of you and instead of helping you are thinking whether he is dying because of me or not.

Thirdly, each species is very important for the ecosystem of the world as they are positioned at someplace in the food chain. And that helps to sustain the ecosystem independently. So, if one species get extinct, which will affect other species also, and ultimately affect the equilibrium of the entire ecosystem. For example, if suppose the population of antelope get extinct, which is the primary source of food for tigers, then that will directly influence the population of tigers, as many may die because of the scarcity of food. Thus, it is our responsibility to preserve each species so that the balance of nature will be maintained.

In conclusion, some may argue that if some species are at risk of extinction, then probably they are not able to adapt well with the changing environment, and humans should not interfere as that is not because of human activities. But the biggest cause of the change of nature is humans themselves, so they may not be directly related to the extinction of a particular species, but the indirect relation is quite evident. Thus, humans should treat every creature as equal, and if someone is at the danger of getting extinct, humans should do every possible action to save them.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 490, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
... influence the population of tigers, as many may die because of the scarcity of food. Th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 551.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98003629764 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66521219597 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451905626134 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0839586442 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.304347826 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9565217391 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264992470271 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769818320823 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616013619052 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149614058484 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282345974653 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.