tpo40-Q1
The article states that maintaining a human presence on Venus is impossible due to its extreme and inhospitable conditions and provides three reasons to support. However the professor explains that maintain a permanent presence on Venus is certainly possible and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading passage states that atmospheric pressure at Venus surface is too greater than pressures at Earth surface and make problem. The professor refutes this point by saying that this pressure is normal equal to the pressures at Earth surface.
Second, the article posits that due to there are no reservoirs of water on Venus surface, it should supply water to Venus from Earth. While, the professor says that there are carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid in the Venus atmosphere, so chemical process can make water. According to the professor it is not necessary to import water from earth to Venus.
Third, the passage claims that very little sunlight reaches the Venus surface due to thick clouds that surround its atmosphere. The professor opposes this point by saying that the clouds which fill the atmosphere are not very thick. He also explains the clouds reflect sunlight to the planet therefore humans could use solar power cells by getting electricity of both direct and reflect sunlight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and provides three reasons to support. However the professor explains that maintain a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21698113208 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48881442121 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3375234333 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.6 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432061388471 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171425979733 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513919837013 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241643679441 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507165042285 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.