TPO 20 Integrated
Both the author and the lecturer are discussing about the “let it burn” policy for the forest fires. The author argues that this is a harmful policy for some ideas, while the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that it is not a bad idea to let the forest burn.
First of all, the author points out that burning causes damage to trees and other vegetation. The lecturer challenges this point. She says that when bigger and older trees burn, they will free up some space for new plants to grow up and this will also help the vegetation.
Secondly, the author contends that wildlife will be endangered as well and the food chains will be disrupted. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She believes that the new plants will attract some small insects that can be good food for small animals like rabbits and rats, and these animals will attract bigger ones. Therefore, the food chain will become better than before.
Finally, the author believes that burning has negative impacts on tourism and therefore the local economy. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it cannot have bad influences. She believes that this will have a negative influence whenever it happens every year, but when this phenomenon happened just once; it will not decrease the number of tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the lecturer are discussing about the apos;let it burn apos; policy for the fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84955752212 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18988554853 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8851262248 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3076923077 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147034235586 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602262604859 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530154185054 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974167553712 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04831164356 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.