Integrated TPO 42
The article brings three reasons to prevent the birds from flying through glass windows. However, the professor put the solutions under question. He asserts that none of these solutions would stop birds, which will be discussed in the following.
The first solution brought by the author is to replace normal glasses with one-way glasses. Nonetheless, the professor makes the point that one-way glasses reflex the light like a mirror. In fact, birds see the reflection of sky or trees in the glass. Therefore, they would fly into them.
Second, the article raised another option of using colorful lines outside the windows, such as stripes. In contrast, the lecturer declares that windows with designs include opening shapes, which birds see as an open hole and consequently fly through them. Moreover, if unpainted parts become smaller, the room of the building would become darker.
Another argument defines as a third solution, which relates to using the artificial magnetic field in order to guide birds away from buildings. Birds have a natural ability to sense the Earth’s magnetic field. So this solution could work. On the contrary, the speaker refutes the solution that birds use the sense only for long distances and use their eyes and brightness of light for short trips. As a result, the third solution is not convincing either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18721461187 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44123613548 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639269406393 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8908373562 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7333333333 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475168475516 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131074470541 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740080238256 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248216448422 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040486552479 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.