Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
The advent of different transportation ways has enabled a major paradigm shift to people’s daily life, and it was so significant that it had an undeniable role in virtually any industry. Many critics Have been debating whether or not the governemnt should allocate more funds on internet infrastructure than public transportation. In some situations a good internet is very important and indispensable, however, public transportation has a more important role in peoples life. In my view, government should not expend more budget to internet access in contrast to public transportation.
The first and foremost reason is that the public transportation have a crucial effect on price of all goods, and consequently affects people’s daily life. A pertinent example can shed light on this assertion. Three years ago, an abrupt increase in fuel’s price made a surge of increasement in all goods price. From vegetables to milk, meat and even the bread. When the price of was swelled, transportation was more expensive, therefore the farmer had to spend more money for the gasoline. On the other hand shipment of cattles was affected and this made a cascade negative impact on the economy of our country. After month of protest, the government decreased the fee of fuel and things backed to normal. As can be seen, a decision which had affected public transportation, led to lots of reactions from people and compelled the government to accept its mistake
Another reason that should be taken into account is that the budget of making roads, subways, airports etc is markedly more than an excellent internet access requirements. These days, the price of raw oil is ascending in a high rate, and it can have a great impact on transportation conditions. For one thing, raw oil which is converted to a large number of goods, is an undegradable part of the asphalt, which is base of the roads. Moreover, gasoline price is also directly related to the price of oil. On the other hand, experts in he field of Information Technology are finding newer and more convinient way for internet access which makes it cheaper. Consequently, expenses of the internet infrastructure is increasingly
According to the reasons mentioned above, administrators should not invest more on internet than public transportation because of two reasons. First, it controls prices of many goods which deals with peoples daily needs. What is more, public transportation need much more efforts and financial resources to be improved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...dustry. Many critics Have been debating whether or not the governemnt should allocate more fun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ne thing, raw oil which is converted to a large number of goods, is an undegradable part of the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 532, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in the field'?
Suggestion: in the field
...rice of oil. On the other hand, experts in he field of Information Technology are finding n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 538, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'fields'.
Suggestion: fields
...f oil. On the other hand, experts in he field of Information Technology are finding n...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... internet infrastructure is increasingly According to the reasons mentioned above...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in contrast, for one thing, in contrast to, in my view, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22273781903 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13043171389 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524361948956 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9832103666 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.19047619 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52380952381 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384538642145 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122521209712 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173314098085 0.0737576698707 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327363439822 0.150856017488 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.340579462713 0.0645574589148 528% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.