As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you

It is universally praised by the people to live healthy life as much as they can. And it is possible in this modern era to fulfill their this dream because of modern facilities provided in the hospital sector. But this shows result in argument in positive way as well as negative way. Let us examine both views before reaching a concrete decision.

To commence with, the advancement in medical care have increased as compared to previous days. And the people who said that it shows the positive effect in humans in several ways . One of them is that the modern facilities of hospitals are providing better treatment of diseases which was not there a decade ago. Moreover, the sophisticated surgery has become much easier by the help of modern robots which increases the success rate of operation. For instance, the medical association of India has declared that they are using Augmented Reality bin the medical field to identify the root of the disease. Hence, the medical innovationa are blessings for humans.

Those who stay with the negative impact of medical innovations claimed that this will cause overpopulation. And the elderly people's ratio is also increasing day by day which will show negative effect in nation's economy which creates a huge burden for the government to incure the cost of these citizens.

To recapitulate, medical advancements have both, it's pros and cons. I personally believe that medical innovations are boom to humankind and the government has to show more responsibility to manage the ageing population.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ositive effect in humans in several ways . One of them is that the modern faciliti...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...l cause overpopulation. And the elderly peoples ratio is also increasing day by day whi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08267716535 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77943234076 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59842519685 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9959181591 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2142857143 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195116654104 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634922238139 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368760060652 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109081132203 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270723042027 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.