The author has explained a case here in which even though there has been an increase in positive reviews for specific Super screen movies, less number of people know about the other movies which have not received any reviews and hence Super screen should allocate a greater share of its budget to reach out public through advertisement. There could be many other reasons apart from, Advertising and creating awareness about the movies among public, the author has not considered here.
Firstly, with the survey, the exact number of people who have given positive reviews is not known. Even if the percentage of people have increased, subsequently the number of movies might have also increased drastically from the past year. This does not give a clear idea whether actually the number of reviews have increased, remained constant or decreased. Super Screen might be advertising their movies in the news papers that are not popular and bought less in numbers by general public,due to which the reviews might not be reaching people who are really interested in watching movies.
Secondly, the super screen movie producers might not be taking efforts in putting up posters of their upcoming movies at public places like the other movies do. Very few movies of super screen those are watched by their actual fans must have become popular because these fans might have told their friends and relatives to watch these limited movies.
Lastly, in comparison with other movies shown in theaters, super screen movies, due to low budget might be projecting only at small screen theaters. Majority of the public might not like to watch movies in small screen theaters. Also due to less public and limited show timings, very few movies of super screen would be receiving reviews.
Considering the above possibilities even if super screen invests in advertising their movies and encourage people to watch their upcoming movies, public won't give better reviews unless the facilities provided are satisfactory to the viewers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c, the author has not considered here. Firstly, with the survey, the exact numb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...t popular and bought less in numbers by general public,due to which the reviews might not be r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , due
...bought less in numbers by general public,due to which the reviews might not be reach...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... really interested in watching movies. Secondly, the super screen movie produce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...latives to watch these limited movies. Lastly, in comparison with other movies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... watch movies in small screen theaters. Also due to less public and limited show tim...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...per screen would be receiving reviews. Considering the above possibilities even...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'lastly', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'apart from']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245070422535 0.25644967241 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.171830985915 0.15541462614 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121126760563 0.0836205057962 145% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0788732394366 0.0520304965353 152% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0197183098592 0.0272364105082 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112676056338 0.125424944231 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0704225352113 0.0416121511921 169% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.39989961123 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225352112676 0.026700313972 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0056338028169 0.001811407834 311% => OK
Determiners: 0.0760563380282 0.113004496875 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030985915493 0.0255425247493 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0169014084507 0.0127820249294 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2066.0 2731.13054187 76% => OK
No of words: 328.0 446.07635468 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2987804878 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.40243902439 0.378187486979 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.246951219512 0.287650121315 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15243902439 0.208842608468 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0914634146341 0.135150697306 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39989961123 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 207.018472906 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496951219512 0.469332199767 106% => OK
Word variations: 50.8334428697 52.1807786196 97% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 27.3333333333 23.2022227129 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9767322441 57.7814097925 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.166666667 141.986410481 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.2022227129 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.58251231527 195% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 52.0284552846 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.58333333333 1.8405768891 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430199314703 0.441005458295 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.188930324982 0.135418324435 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102189858769 0.0829849096947 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.693096390696 0.58762219726 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129605846704 0.147661913831 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203310827218 0.193483328276 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634753629762 0.0970749176394 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.367427233583 0.42659136922 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0472514604299 0.0774707102158 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285905466553 0.312017818177 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204214862148 0.0698173142475 29% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 6.46551724138 170% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.