According to the recent reports from out marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended the Super screen production movies than any other year. And yet the percentage of movies positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific super screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly the content of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective reviewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of the movies but the people’s lack of awareness that good quality movies are available. Super screen should allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching its public through advertisement.
As per the author's claim Super screen production should allocate greater share of its budget to advertising in order to reach public but the proofs given are the author are quite inadequate and vague. Author does not consider all the parameter or necessary requirements that people consider before planning to watch a movie. Just by increase in few good reviews he claims that advertising should be increased its budget as people are not aware of their production house movies.
As per the author's statement fewer people attended the Super screen production movies last year than any other year so it indicate a gradual fall in people choice of their production company. This shows that the author’s analysis is not consistent. Based on increase in reviews he is considering the fact that their quality if movie is good and people would like there movie once they come to know about it.
But it can be the reason that most people already know about Super screen production, but they prefer watching movies done by famous actors while Super screen production casts only mid level actors or struggling actors. And so many people are not watching their movies. Moreover the storyline of Super screen production movies is same as other production or the concept is almost the same and so people prefer going movies of other productions which have casted famous actors or better actors.
Although author mention the few people attended the movie and yet there was increase in reviews. It may be due to the fact that people did will not be expecting much quality movies from Super screen production movies but somehow they delivered it and these people gave a positive review. But the quality may be not so good in order to compete with the big production houses so those people would not have recommended it to their friends to watch the movies. And many times people provide fake good reviews as a curtsy and so this could also have been one of the reasons for increased no. of good reviews of the Super screen production.
Thus the claims presents by the author are not properly evaluated and so based so such vague and incomplete claims we cannot conclude that the quality of the movies produced are good and so we cannot increase the budget of advertisement.
- Some people like to follow there dreams and while some people want to be practical in their life Choose one47
- Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.The followin100
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.70
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.50
- The best way for a society is to prepare its young people for leadership in government , industry or other fieldsis by instilling them a sense of cooperation, not competition.50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... production house movies. As per the authors statement fewer people attended the Sup...
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'indicates'?
...ies last year than any other year so it indicate a gradual fall in people choice of thei...
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...y people are not watching their movies. Moreover the storyline of Super screen productio...
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...iews of the Super screen production. Thus the claims presents by the author are n...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282926829268 0.25644967241 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.160975609756 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090243902439 0.0836205057962 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0658536585366 0.0520304965353 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0487804878049 0.0272364105082 179% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112195121951 0.125424944231 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0414634146341 0.0416121511921 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43404195967 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.019512195122 0.026700313972 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0853658536585 0.113004496875 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0268292682927 0.0255425247493 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00487804878049 0.0127820249294 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2276.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 388.0 446.07635468 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86597938144 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363402061856 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.208762886598 0.287650121315 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.14175257732 0.208842608468 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0824742268041 0.135150697306 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43404195967 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 207.018472906 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451030927835 0.469332199767 96% => OK
Word variations: 47.5461227855 52.1807786196 91% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 25.8666666667 23.2022227129 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0569630796 57.7814097925 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.733333333 141.986410481 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8666666667 23.2022227129 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.533333333333 0.724660767414 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 46.7429553265 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.58407079646 1.8405768891 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483540136683 0.441005458295 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126778519146 0.135418324435 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0723882858851 0.0829849096947 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589680594835 0.58762219726 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173944913779 0.147661913831 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21703421986 0.193483328276 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961560548617 0.0970749176394 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.362998461439 0.42659136922 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0219391642865 0.0774707102158 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324184143935 0.312017818177 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595079683174 0.0698173142475 85% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.